Cambridge
Dictionary has changed its definition of “Man” to include “an adult who lives
and identifies as a male though they may have been said to have a different sex
at birth” while “Woman” is now defined
as an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said
to have a different sex at birth.”
According
to New York Post, both definitions previously reflected the outdated views on
sex, which assumed that sex and gender identity always adhered to one another.
The
alterations were swiftly criticised on the Internet, with American-Canadian
political commentator, Steven Crowder tweeting, “Remember, if you can control
the language, you can control the population.”
In
the same vein, Daily Caller writer, Mary Rooke called the dictionary writers
“F-ing traitors to the truth.”
“Cambridge Dictionary is only the latest. If
we don’t stop them from erasing women our civilization is [not going to make
it],” she claimed.
Dan
McLaughlin, a senior writer at National Review, viewed the revision as
dystopian as opposed to progressive.
“1984
wasn’t supposed to be a how-to manual,” he tweeted. Similarly, the UK-based
group Bristol Leading Against Transphobia commended the decision as “Fantastic
news.”
Still,
some social media users pushed back on the backlash, labelling critics
transphobic and celebrating the changes as more inclusive.
“Guess
what transphobes are upset about now? You guessed the dictionary, didn’t you,”
Evan Urquhart of Assigned Media tweeted.
“[Trans-exclusionary
radical feminists] ganna [sp] blow a gasket,” sculptor Daniel Lismore shared.
“Trans people deserve to be recognized for who they are.”
No comments:
Post a Comment